|
With
New Year’s Day 2004 falling on Thursday, I spent
an extended weekend in Los Angeles to catch as many
worthy year-end film releases as possible. However,
the real treat was no 2003 Oscar candidate, but
came from an American Cinematheque retrospective
at the historic Egyptian Theater on Satyajit
Ray and his incomparable Apu Trilogy. Not living
in a locale with an active cinema arthouse in the
1950’s and 1960’s, I never had a chance to experience
Ray’s work when it first played in the U.S., and
somehow his films had been lying low under my radar
since then. Yet, just as Roger Ebert firmly states
that “sooner or later, everyone who loves movies
comes to Ozu,”
exactly the same applies to Ray.
No one has ever poignantly captured the spirit of
Bengali life as artfully, yet Ray’s work is more
universal than anything collectively produced by
Hollywood and Bollywood.
Born into a family of artists
and intellectuals in 1921, Ray
graduated from his local Calcutta University in
economics, studied over two years in the arts at
Santiniketan until the Japanese bombed Calcutta,
and then became a commercial artist. While working
for a British advertising firm, he developed a fondness
for Western classical music and Western films, and
he began to draft film scripts—a Bengali adaptation
of The Prisoner of Zenda,
for example. Not surprisingly, he soon grew to appreciate
directors like John Ford, Frank Capra, Fritz Lang,
and Ernst Lubitch, but his film career began in
earnest during a six month business trip to London
in 1950. Ray devoured 99 films, taking copious notes
on cinematography, use of music, editing, and other
technical observations. The real turning point came
when he saw The
Bicycle Thief, however. Now convinced
that he could create the kind of cinema he had dreamed
of, DeSica’s Italian neo-realistic masterpiece confirmed
that he could use rough film stock, non-actors without
make-up, and shoot in the rain. Indian film has
never been the same.
Still it would be five years
before his cinematic vision would reach fruition.
Inexperience, funding, and financial swindles handicapped
the project, but Ray
was determined to turn his script of Bibhuti Bhusan’s
Pather Panchali into a
film. Putting up his own money to shoot one scene
(where Apu and Durga run through the Pampas grass
to see a passing train), Ray began. Fortuitously,
legendary director John Huston saw the footage while
scouting locations for The Man Who Would
Be King. Between Huston’s promotion
and the Bengali agency for road improvement, Ray
received the necessary financial backing and was
able to book a screening for his first film at New
York’s Museum of Modern Art.
This led to Cannes, and
the beginning of a fertile career that ranks Ray
as India’s premier cinematic auteur. Not only did
Ray direct twenty-nine feature films, but he also
wrote the scripts, composed much of the music, and
participated directly in the art direction, casting,
and cinematography. More than any other Indian director,
Satyajit Ray reaches into the heart of his native
country and gently pours out unsurpassed visual
poems that convey India’s transition from traditional
ways into twentieth century life. Like Orson Welles,
his greatest work is his first project. Fortunately,
we can consider all three of his first films as
a single entity, as they trace Apu’s life from birth
to manhood in the preeminent “coming of age” epic
ever created on celluloid.
Ideally, the Apu Trilogy
should be experienced in one sitting (with short
breaks since six hours may be stretching endurance
beyond reasonable cinematic asceticism). I didn’t
have that bounty the first time I was able to watch
the three films--Pather Panchali,
Aparajito, and Apur
Sansar. The retrospective was screened
on three separate days in L.A. (accompanied by a
really ineptly conceived 90-minute documentary that
was little more than a slide show made bearable
only by a few film clips from Ray’s
films), and I had to leave town before the final
film. Although these films and other Ray films were
championed by arthouse patrons and critics like
Pauline Kael, they generally only screened at festivals
and rare arthouses in the late 1950’s and during
the 1960’s. Since then, only Parisian cineastes
have had access to them, and many copies had fallen
into disrepair.
Merchant-Ivory Productions
has come to the rescue and preserved the Apu Trilogy
as well as humanely possible, and the films have
just been released on DVD. This has allowed me to
watch the final chapter of Apu’s epic journey, as
well as afforded me the chance to see all three
films a second time within a 24-hour period. Serving
as a virtual love poem to rural India and Calcutta,
Ray’s trilogy
contains absolutely no pretense as it follows Apu’s
journey to manhood. This is so different from the
experience I had watching Conrad Rooks’ adaptation
of Herman Hesse’s Siddhartha,
a beautiful looking film that just doesn’t translate
Hesse’s profundity adequately. I thought that these
concepts are far too abstract to be portrayed cinematically,
but Ray proves me wrong. This trilogy really covers
much the same territory, yet achieves it so subtly
that it feels like an amiable hug, and does so with
real people that we get to truly care about and
share in their joys and sorrows. Played by various
non-professional (at the time) actors from the age
of six to twenty-four, Apu is very much like his
father—a peaceful, optimistic idealist. Yet he has
ambitions to go beyond his father’s traditional
priestly duties. Apu dreams of seeing beyond the
confines of his village, and has vague notions about
becoming a scholar, specializing in the sciences,
and even penning his own novel. To do so requires
experiencing Life in all its facets, and the Apu
trilogy breaks down his childhood, youth, and adulthood
as follows:
 |
Pather
Panchali
(Song of the Road)
|
 |
Born into the prestigious
Brahmin caste doesn’t insure material wealth,
especially when living in his father’s ancestral
village. To pay off his own father’s debts, Harihar
Ray (Kanu Bannerjee) has bequeathed the family
orchard to the neighbors, which troubles his more
practically minded wife Sarbojaya (Karuna Bannerjee).
She argues that they could live far more comfortably
in Benares on the banks of the Ganges, where her
husband could regularly perform priestly rituals.
But with a loving wife, an energetic daughter
named Durga, newborn son Apu, and enough food
to survive Hari feels content.
Filled with idyllic images
and very human sequences where the children and
ducks parade after the local candy-man in Felliniesque
fashion, and brother and sister often lovingly
play childish pranks on each other. The real scene-stealer
is 80-year old Auntie (Chunibala Devi, one of
only three professional actress in the ensemble
cast). Durga bonds with the rebellious spirit
of her elderly aunt, supplying her with stolen
guavas from the neighbor’s orchard that inspire
huge toothless smiles to the old woman and responsible
scolding from Durga’s vigilant mother.
Two thematic highlights
of the first Apu film come from the train and
death sequences, both recurring in each chapter
of the trilogy. Apu’s obvious fascination with
the train foretells change in the family traditions,
as he is destined to travel his own path. In Hindu
philosophy Death is closely connected with Life,
and the concept of Re-incarnation holds that rebirth
results from the destruction of this life.
Thus, Apu’s first encounter
with Death is very childlike--coming as no surprise
to the audience since Auntie hints strongly that
she’s not long for this world, Apu can only stare
at her with mouth open. A much harder loss for
the family comes following a beautifully filmed
monsoon sequence, signaled with an abrupt cut
to the likeness of the Hindu god Ganesha, a powerful
Elephant-like deity of wisdom. With this loss
comes a rebirth, as the family cuts its ties to
its ancestral past and journeys to new life in
Benares.
 |
Aparajito
(The Unvanquished)
|
 |
Picking up Apu’s story
in Benares, the ten-year old must cope with his
father’s sickness and death and his over-protective
mother before achieving independence and heading
for university life in Calcutta. Some beautifully
structured sequences demonstrate Apu’s academic
gifts and great curiosity about the world, with
his excited attempts to explain solar eclipses
to his caring but non-comprehending mother and
later dresses as an exuberant African native after
reading a biography about Livingstone.
The best moments come
from Benares, however. And the film’s most memorable
moment comes at the moment of Hari’s death--the
glimpse in his eye as he takes his last swallow
of holy water from the Ganges, coupled with the
roof’s pigeons abruptly fleeing, noisily flapping
skyward. Had Apu’s father lived longer, it’s possible
that he would have continued the priestly traditions
as his great uncle desires, but this death again
leads to a new life, and it's not the last for
Apu.
As a seventeen-year old,
he becomes completely independent after his mother
weakens and dies, and her dying sequence that
begins with visuals of her son's sun dial and
continues through the fireflies of the evening
is also artfully constructed. Although not reprise
here, old Auntie's song from the first film comes
to mind:
“Those who come after
have already gone
Leaving me behind the poorest of beggars
Not a cowrie to my name.
Night's mantle descends
Row me across to the other side.”
[4.5 of 5 stars]
 |
Apur
Sansar
(The World of Apu)
|
 |
In many ways, the final
chapter of the trilogy weaves the most compelling
story. Apu (now played by Soumitra Chatterjee)
remains a true romantic after leaving the intermediate
Calcutta University due to lack of funds. He earns
a few rupees a month through tutoring, but spends
most of his time fantasizing vaguely about the
future, playing his flute, and writing his novel—justifying
his starving artist lifestyle as necessary for
his creativity. Living in a cheap apartment on
the top floor overlooking the railroad tracks
on the outskirts of Calcutta, he also has to charm
his landlord with wit and promises to pay the
rent, as he’s three months overdue.
An orphan without family
obligations, Apu has detached himself from most
of humanity until his closest friend Pulu (Swapan
Mukherjee) finally tracks him down, treats him
to a good meal, and convinces him to accompany
him to see his sister's wedding in a rural village
100 miles from the city. Bizarre circumstances
arise, and Apu ends up the substitute groom to
prevent Pulu’s family from disgrace.
Although this may seem
contrived, Ray prepares the way with at least
two foreshadowing references. As soon as Pulu’s
mother sees Apu, she declares his face to resemble
Lord Krishna, while previously Pulu has chastised
Apu for his novel. Easily recognizable as more
autobiography than fiction, Pulu becomes incredulous
when told that the protagonist will have a love
interest. How can this be, he asks since Apu has
never been within 10 feet of a woman. He scoffs
at Apu’s romantic notions about using his imagination—Pulu
is far more grounded in reality.
But now, Apu is forced
to mature. No longer can he live only for himself,
and Ray tenderly unveils their developing relationship
that begins with great trepidation and graduates
into playful intimacy and caring. True to the
overall theme of the trilogy, death and rebirth
must make their mark. After earlier significant
deaths Apu expresses curiosity, stoic acceptance,
and natural grief before moving on to a new life.
But this is his biggest
test, and the young man who has charmed with his
good naturedness and easy laugh grows despondent
to the point of considering suicide. No longer
the easy going romantic, Apu buries his dreams
and disbands his novel to seek "peace" through
routine work in a remote mine, but once again
Pulu brings him to his senses by reminding him
of his five year old son. The redemption sequence
ending the trilogy is anticipated, yet Ray creatively
infuses it with humor and pathos to make it truly
memorable.
A profoundly moving tone
poem to rural India and its people, Ray's artistry
is unsurpassed in the Apu trilogy. What truly amazes
is how well each tightly constructed story flows
naturally like the Ganges River without artificial
contrivances. This is all done with an inexperienced
filmmaking crew, yet Satyajit Ray loved movies and
was a true student of the art. Here he demonstrates
his instincts supremely.
Cinematographer Subrata
Mitra had never worked with moving images before
Pather Panchali, but he
was a professional stills photographer. You can
see this aspect in virtually every shot—visually
rich, remarkably framed, balanced, and composed.
Not content with only the visual, Ray is equally
meticulous about the sound and music. Notably, Ray
enlisted Ravi Shankar to improvise various sitar
pieces of various moods and tempos over a marathon
11-hour recording session, mostly without seeing
the film. Ray's sound editing and ear for the appropriate
music make the trilogy worth just listening to--my
favorite single musical moment occurs when water-striders
(spider-like insects) are accompanied by a lively
raga.
The Apu Trilogy remains
one of the most remarkable accomplishments in film
history, and the only reason we generally don’t
hear as much about it as a number of other neorealistic
works is that relatively few people have seen Ray's
work. Both Pather Panchali
and Apur Sansar can stand
independently on their own while the middle section,
Aparajito, really needs
the opening context. Yet, if you’ve seen just one
of these films, I can't imagine resisting the others
since they become like a close friend that we long
to hear more from. In a day when special effects
and spectacular action tend to dominate commercial
films, Ray's
quiet epic trilogy becomes a refuge against overkill
of the senses—a cinematic meditation. The subjects
may be Bengali, but the universal film gently reminds
all of us about Life’s essentials, and in the process
renews our faith in the power of the medium.
|